The Kenyan lawyer first went to the International Court of Justice in The Hague for the first time in 2013, saying that "selective and malicious prosecution of Christ violated his human rights through judicial misconduct and violated the principle of impartiality and prejudgment".
The lawyer remained determined to proceed with his case and returned in March of the same year to appeal to the International Court of Justice again, hoping to approve the trial.
"I have made this case because it is my duty to preserve the dignity of Christ. I have appealed to the International Court of Justice for justice," said Dola Andes.
"The selective and malicious prosecution of Christ has violated his human rights through judicial misconduct and the violation of the principle of impartiality of authority and the issuance of prejudices."
During his appeal, the lawyer claimed that the method of interrogation used in the trial of Christ, in addition to the trial itself, hearing witnesses and passing judgment, were all illegal.
The information used against Christ was probably flawed and flawed, and his torture during the trial ran counter to all forms of justice.
The lawyer wishes the International Court of Justice to see that "proceedings before the Romanian courts are legally void, as they do not conform to the principle of the rule of law at that time and at any time thereafter".
He said: "Some of those present spat at him, beat him with their fists, beat him and mocked him, and then declared him worthy of death ... I judge them as a friend, the evidence exists in the Bible, and you can not deny the Bible."
"I know the fact that we have a good case and a high probability of success, and I hope that it is completed and I am alive."
The Kenyan lawyer also wants to sue Emperor Tiberius, Pontius Pilate, King Herod the First and a number of Jewish priests, all of whom died more than 2,000 years ago.
The Kenyan lawyer believes that governments still bear the responsibility, so Italy and Israel are heirs to the false judgment of Christ.
